How nice is Docker?


how-nice-is-docker

Posted in math | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Four color theorem: A fast algorithm – 2


https://4coloring.wordpress.com/2016/10/16/four-color-theorem-a-fast-algorithm

These are the OLD and NEW (last column) execution times on my new laptop:

  • 100 – 196 vertices, 294 edges = 0 seconds – 0 seconds
  • 200 – 396 vertices, 594 edges = 1 seconds – 0 seconds
  • 300 – 596 vertices, 894 edges = 4 seconds – 1 second
  • 400 – 796 vertices, 1194 edges = 6 seconds – 1 second
  • 500 – 996 vertices, 1494 edges = 8 seconds – 2 seconds
  • 600 – 1196 vertices, 1794 edges = 10 seconds – 4 seconds
  • 700 – 1396 vertices, 2094 edges = 16 seconds – 6 seconds
  • 800 – 1596 vertices, 2394 edges = 18 seconds – 7 seconds
  • 900 – 1796 vertices, 2694 edges = 22 seconds – 9 seconds
  • 1000 – 1996 vertices, 2994 edges = 26 seconds – 11 seconds
Posted in math | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

I moved the code under github


I moved all code under github here: https://github.com/stefanutti

  • I organized the folders a little betters (different github repos)
  • I’m experimenting docker to deliver & deploy the Java and Python software
  • I’ll also try to integrate a deep learning module, based on Tensorflow, to help me find the “missing piece”

github-home

Posted in math | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Four color theorem: about edges selection


For the decomposition of a graph representing a map, I’m trying to use different algorithms to select the edge to remove.

The question is:

  • When you have multiple valid choices, which is the best edge to select … if any?

Some basic rules are:

  • Avoid new F5 to be created
  • Get rid of F5 whenever is possible, selecting the edge of a face with 2, 3 or 4 edges
  • Consider to remove an edge from an F5 face only if no faces with 2, 3, 4 edges exist

Here are all possibilities. Last 2 groups (removing edges from F5 and F6) don’t have to be taken into account. I just wanted to see how it continued after the cases with faces made of 2, 3, 4 and 5 edges:

edges-selection-possibilities

Posted in math | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Four color theorem: new ideas


This is what I want to try:

  • Select an F2, F3  or F4 preferably when it is near an F5 and remove the edge that joins the two faces
    • Analyse also the balance of the Euler’s identity when removing edges, to decide if it is better to choose other couple: F2 near the highest or other possibilities
  • Let Deepmind DQN (or Tensorflow) learn the best approach for selecting faces and remove the edges
    • Controls:
      • The selection of the face and the edge based on the characteristics of the neighbor faces
    • Scope:
      • Avoid the F5 worst case (in the rebuilding phase), when it is necessary to apply the random Kempe’s color switches to solve the impasse

The rule: avoid F5 or at least do not create them.

avoid-f5

  • Remove F2 when near F5 –> Good (will get rid of the F5 and generate an F3)
  • Remove F3 when near F5 –> Good (will get rid of the F5 and generate an F4)
  • Remove F4 when near F5 –> NOT Good (will end up with another F5)
  • Remove F5 when near F5 –> Good (will get rid of the F5 and generate an F6)

Other to avoid:

  • Remove F2 when near F7 –> NOT Good (will end up with another F5)
  • Remove F3 when near F6 –> NOT Good (will end up with another F5)

NOTE:

  • It is also important to check what appens to f3 and f4
Posted in math | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Four color theorem: what next?


The algorithm I use to color graphs works pretty well … BUT:

  • Sometimes (very rarely) it gets into an infinite loop where also random Kempe color switches (around the entire graph) do NOT work. The good is, if I reprocess the same graph from the beginning (since in a part of the code I choose edges randomly), the algorithm usually works fine

So, what now?

I want to try other strategies while removing edges from the original graph, to avoid the above condition. I want to eliminate the need of random swithes.

The sequence I used so far is:

  • Select an F2 and if an F2 does not exist, select an F3 an so on: F4 and then F5. Once selected the face, I remove a random edge from it, only paying attention not to chose the edge if the resulting graph is 1-connected

I want to try:

  • Change the order of selecting the faces
    • Combinations
      • 2, 3, 4, 5 –> This is the default in the current version of the program (22/Nov/2016)
      • 3, 2, 4, 5
      • 4, 2, 3, 5
    • I want to try all possible combinations to see if … may be … if I’m really lucky, some does not require random swithes
  • Once selected the face, I want to try other strategies to select the edge to remove
    • random edge –> This is the default in the current version of the program (22/Nov/2016)
    • Among all the edges of the face, select the one that is shared with the face that has less edges respect to the other F
    • … that has more …

A planar cubic graphs to visualize what I wrote in this post:

haken-appel-hardest-case-map

Posted in math | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Four color theorem: Infinite switches are not enough – Rectangular maps :-(


I transformed the really bad case into a rectangular map to play with the Java program and Kempe random switches.

Here is the graph with the two edges to connect:

save-graph-really-bad-case

The two edges marked with the X, have to be joined by a new edge that form a new F5 face.

To try the Java program, rebuild this graph and play with the switches, it is possible to use this string:

  • 1b+, 2b+, 3b+, 4b+, 5b+, 15b+, 14b-, 13b-, 5e-, 6b-, 12b-, 4e-, 8b-, 13e-, 6e-, 9b-, 12e-, 11b-, 3e-, 14e-, 10b-, 7b-, 2e-, 8e-, 9e-, 11e-, 7e-, 10e-, 15e+, 1e+

Next is the graph that shows how the graph has been converted:

really_bad_case-ariadne_step-5-12-7-32-6-15-10-ppt

Posted in math | Tagged , , | Leave a comment